Hi Maruf,

Week one is done. ClearPost wrote and published 8 articles on onlinevideoplayer.net, one a day, all live, none failed: browser players compared, playing a video URL in seconds, casting to Chromecast, the YouTube thumbnail downloader, MP4 in the browser, iPhone video editors, playing video from Google Drive, and screen mirroring PC to TV.

The reason those topics and not others: you already rank for 663 keywords, and not one of them is on page one yet. "Youtube video watcher" is 3,600 searches a month and you sit at twenty. "Play video by url" is 1,900 and you sit at eighteen. That is a bank of nearly-there rankings, and almost nobody starts a month from that position.

Nothing has moved yet, and it should not have. Across our customers the median time to a first Google impression is six days and to a first click thirteen. Your oldest article is eight days old. This is the week it starts, not the week it shows.

Thirty more articles are already written into your calendar: why a video will not play in Chrome, HLS and .m3u8 streaming, MKV without VLC, and streaming any link from a URL. That is next month at the same pace, and they are aimed squarely at the page-two terms rather than at new ground.

On cost, a writer or agency doing researched pieces like these charges $200 to $500 each. Thirty a month is $6,000 to $15,000. ClearPost is $99 a month for the same 30.

Your trial ended yesterday afternoon and the queue is paused. To start it again: continue with ClearPost

Either way, tell me what you would change. That is the part that improves the product.

Best,
Christian